In response to Felix Salmon on Portfolio.Com’s Market Movers:
Economic reasoning (actually all philosophical reasoning) is the study of processes from first causes to last causes. Any cause that is not first-cause is simply making assumptions. A practical person [...]
An awful lot of talk, debate, argument, and out-and-out violence over methods of governance tends to occur because people talk past each other, and it’s usually because they are each making assumptions about the properties of government that aren’t true. [...]
In response to Michael Mandel’s article for Business Week.
Is Social Security a Ponzi Scheme? Response to Comments
I’ve read through all the comments on my previous post, and I wanted to see if I could respond [...]
In Conflicts, In Wars, Within A Cooperative Farmer Morality, Farmers Need To Win
Every civilization is a reaction to another civilization with whom they interact, and by whom they are threatened.
All of us in the West know that England is [...]
From: Kyle
Subject: Deficits Don’t Matter
Paul Krugman was awarded the Nobel Prize for economics this year. In his latest column he decries naysayers such as Curt, myself and Aaron as having it all wrong. Thoughts?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008456599_opin02krugman.html
-Kyle
—————–
(GOOD STUFF BELOW I THINK FOR THE SMART FOLKS ON THE LIST)
Chris, all;
RE: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the [...]
There is an article on the Angry Economist that I had to respond to. Largely because so many people agree, and they agree with the author’s position, despite the fact that he is entirely WRONG.
As usual, I might [...]
So this is what I have been saying, except that Greenspan, in his coded language, has removed the recovery option:
“a rebound at this stage is not something … in the immediate outlook”
This is the full Greenspan quote:
“Former [...]
All Kinds of Jargon
From: A Cox Crow: http://www.coxesroost.net/journal/2008/06/15/all-kinds-of-jargon
After reading The Austrian Economists site for a while now, I notice it shares some features with some papers Niall Ferguson posted on his website. Namely, name-dropping.
I’ve been out [...]
The people at the Economics Roundtable – the blog roll I visit every day – have seen fit to legitimize the article below from the Financial Times, by Tim Harford (“Deer Crossing”).
In the article Tim furthers the misconception that [...]
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Recent Posts
-
Putting The American Failure To Support Britain Over Argentina In Strategic Context
32 days ago -
Four Levers Of Policy Create An Opportunity For Exchange
33 days ago -
A Not So Funny, All Too True. Anti Immigration Cartoon
33 days ago -
Teasing Karl Smith: The Futility Of Teaching Pigs To Sing
33 days ago -
An Argument In Support Of Faith As A Limit On The State
34 days ago -
WORD BUDGETS: Writing vs Speaking, and the Male vs Female myth.
35 days ago -
Why Are Conservatives Happier?
35 days ago -
Stratfor On Iran’s Strategy
36 days ago -
A Heretical Question? Do Women Have Too Much Power?
36 days ago -
Libertarian Strategy
37 days ago
-
Putting The American Failure To Support Britain Over Argentina In Strategic Context