I. Curt, what does “Exchange under trade is different from exchange under market.” mean?
Trade and Market are commonly framed as causally synonymous when they are not. Trade is natural to humans. Markets are an institution that humans have made [...]
A Little History For Context
The term ‘Freedom’, and its near relation ‘Liberty’, have a long heritage. The babylonian words “ama-gi”, meaning “Return To The Mother”, written in cuneiform, are often cited by Libertarians as the first written use [...]
Capitalism 3.0
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/02/capitalism-30.html
Over on the Economist’s View there are a whole series of comments that negatively reflect on capitalism. This is my response.
All,
I am amazed reading these comments. What is it about this blog that [...]
This is the abstract for the paper I’m working on.
“ABSTRACT
The success of the Rothbard-Hoppe research program as demonstrated by the explanatory power of the ethics of property is offset by the failure of the three major philosophical [...]
George Lackoff is a professor of linguistics at U.C. Berkeley who makes the observation that conservatives and liberals have different family values.
And while he has correctly identified a difference in family values, he describes it as a cause, rather [...]
In Conflicts, In Wars, Within A Cooperative Farmer Morality, Farmers Need To Win
Every civilization is a reaction to another civilization with whom they interact, and by whom they are threatened.
All of us in the West know that England is [...]
About

Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Conservative Libertarian tradition. And as a methodological Propertarian I attempt to complete the work of Rothbard and Hoppe by suggesting post-democratic political solutions for heterogeneous polities.Purpose
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Connect with:
Recent Posts
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.
70 days ago -
Liberty Isn't Inherent. It's unnatural. We create it with Organized Violence.
74 days ago -
Propertarian Definition: REVOLUTION
74 days ago -
Giving Rorty Another Try
74 days ago -
An Skeleton Argument In Defense Of Rorty From Hoppe
74 days ago -
A Propertarian Definition of Ruthless
74 days ago -
The Self Deception Of The Enlightenment View Of Man
74 days ago -
On Rent Seeking
74 days ago
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.