My Friend Karl Smith's Progressive Framing
Karl States:
“I actually think this issue brings up extremely deep philosophical questions that virtually no one I can find wants to engage in.”
What are you talking about?
No one wants to engage in those conversations? You haven’t posted [...]
Continue Reading →
An Anti-Masculine Bias In Pornography Actors?
An article on slate that says that men are homophobic when watching pornography. In other words, this is another feminist-appealing anti-male rant.
The straight male performer must be attractive enough to serve as a prop, but not so attractive [...]
Continue Reading →
Labor and Education Numbers Illustrate What's Wrong With Progressives And Keynesianism
On Modeled Behavior Karl Smith uses these diagrams, and from it concludes:
“The United States is becoming more educated faster than the economy would absorb educated workers.”
Actually, that statement would attribute value to education that is not demonstrated [...]
Continue Reading →
The desire of the expanders to expand is always exponential. In the end you only need one of them and they will attempt to take over the entire economy. What’s stops them is competition, scarce real [...]
Continue Reading →
Why Do Left-Leaning Economists Ignore IQ Data?
It’s pretty obvious: because it would undermine their entire philosophy.
And no, there is no debate among researchers over the genetic, race and class composition of IQ.
That debate is only conducted among the political class.
Conservatives observe natural laws. [...]
Continue Reading →
Efficiency and equality are dirty words.
Break up the eurozone. That’s what should be done.
Why create another even more totalitarian bureaucracy that abuses our freedoms in europe to match the one in the USA?
The west is special because no one was unable to consolidate [...]
Continue Reading →
Krugman Watch: What Will Happen With Conservatives In Three Houses Of Government?
Paul Quotes David Frum saying:
Backed by their own wing of the book-publishing industry and supported by think tanks that increasingly function as public-relations agencies, conservatives have built a whole alternative knowledge system, with its own facts, its own history, [...]
Continue Reading →
Is The US Any More Or Less Redistributive Than Europe?
On the Economist’s View, a Dr Why, a commenter says
In the United States, countercyclical fiscal and monetary policies redistribute income mainly from the rich to the poor, which is politically acceptable. In Europe, countercyclical policies also redistribute income [...]
Continue Reading →
Why does the right lean toward NGDP targeting?
On Worthwhile Canadian Initiative, Nick Rowe asks “Why isn’t NGDP targeting a lefty thing?” and asks why the right seems to support it, instead of supporting inflation targeting.
My reply was:
Nick,
I think you miss the point that from [...]
Continue Reading →
Predicting Bubbles on Modeled Behavior:
I think we can see and measure booms and bubbles. I just think we’re lying to ourselves when we say we want to stop them.
We WANT people to live beyond their equilibrial (‘natural’) [...]
Continue Reading →
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of Aristocratic philosophy and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Points To Ponder
Recent Posts
-
Defining Capitalism
56 days ago -
Inverting The Argument: Inequality Is The Product Of Diversity
56 days ago -
Why Are Artificial Breasts All The Rage In Columbia?
57 days ago -
From Freedom To Slavery: The Five Evolutionary Stages Of Fiat Money
57 days ago -
Doolittle's Chart's On Political Preferences
64 days ago -
My Friend Karl Smith's Progressive Framing
64 days ago -
An Anti-Masculine Bias In Pornography Actors?
64 days ago -
Labor and Education Numbers Illustrate What's Wrong With Progressives And Keynesianism
64 days ago -
Keynesian Absurd Optimism
66 days ago -
Why Do Left-Leaning Economists Ignore IQ Data?
71 days ago
-
Defining Capitalism