Changing Identity: From American to English-American, to Diasporic Englishman
Sometime within the past six months, I have unconsciously ceased to consider myself an American, and begun to think of myself as an English American – or even just a diasporic Englishman. It wasn’t something I chose. It wasn’t a [...]
Continue Reading →
A Counter To Complaints Against Indefinite Detention
My libertarian friends seem to be making a lot of noise about recent policy that allows the USA to conduct “indefinite detention” in its fight against terroris. And, despite my desire to circle the wagons whenever possible, I don’t have [...]
Continue Reading →
The Arab Spring Demonstrates The Stability Of Monarchy
From Tyler Cowen – Arab Spring and the stability of monarchy
Victor Menaldo has a new paper:
This paper helps explain the variation in political turmoil observed in the MENA during the Arab Spring. The region’s monarchies have [...]
Continue Reading →
The Second and Further Questions Of Politics
The first question of politics is ‘why do I not kill you and take your stuff?’ (Why should we form a cooperative order, versus a dictatorship)
The Second question of politics is ‘what are our property definitions, both communal and [...]
Continue Reading →
I’ve said this many times, but given what I’ve read today, I’ll say it again:
Per Camus, the first question of philosophy is ‘Why don’t we commit suicide?’
That one question is one of philosophy’s most informative riddles.
But I [...]
Continue Reading →
In reference to What is Property? Dual Meanings from Punk Johnny Cash at Gonzo Times, where the author uses the artificial moral dilemma put forth by Proudhon, where a castaway arrives upon a Robinson Crusoe island and is left [...]
Continue Reading →
A Propertarian Analysis Of Your Bedroom Activities
John Quiggin of Crooked Timber writes another misguided criticism of libertarian methodology in Keeping the state out of your bedroom.
A standard theme in (propertarian) libertarian thinking is that personal freedom in matters such as choice of sexual [...]
Continue Reading →
A quote from Hans Hermann Hoppe:
Hoppe also condemned the French revolution as belonging in “the same category of vile revolutions as the Bolshevik revolution and the Nazi revolution,” because the French revolution led to “Regicide, Egalitarianism, democracy, socialism, hatred [...]
Continue Reading →
Classifying People By Their Government Rather Than Occupation Simply Justifies The Expansion Of State Power
Today, Krugman yet again argues that there is a lack of demand.
Yes, there is a lack of demand, I agree.
There is a lack of demand because our lower classes are unproductive in comparison to their peers in [...]
Continue Reading →
Four Reasons For The Long Term Decline In Violence
Regarding Pinker’s new book on the decline in violence in the world over time.
I would argue that there are the following reasons for the worldwide decline in violence.
1. The Abstraction Of Property
Stated by an unnamed commenter [...]
Continue Reading →
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of Aristocratic philosophy and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Points To Ponder
Recent Posts
-
Defining Capitalism
56 days ago -
Inverting The Argument: Inequality Is The Product Of Diversity
56 days ago -
Why Are Artificial Breasts All The Rage In Columbia?
57 days ago -
From Freedom To Slavery: The Five Evolutionary Stages Of Fiat Money
57 days ago -
Doolittle's Chart's On Political Preferences
64 days ago -
My Friend Karl Smith's Progressive Framing
64 days ago -
An Anti-Masculine Bias In Pornography Actors?
64 days ago -
Labor and Education Numbers Illustrate What's Wrong With Progressives And Keynesianism
64 days ago -
Keynesian Absurd Optimism
66 days ago -
Why Do Left-Leaning Economists Ignore IQ Data?
71 days ago
-
Defining Capitalism