Do you know Godwin’s law? That any internet discourse eventually devolves into something involving Hitler?
There is a new law. I’m coining it, as Doolittle’s law: The minute someone mentions Sweden in an economic argument, you know that they’re analysis [...]
Zeus: The One True God. The One True Religion.
So, this silly person sends me a religious diatribe quoting scripture and all manner of other deists as if it’s some scientific and scholarly work that will convince me that it’s the will of god that I do this or [...]
I argue that anarchic propertarianism is a brilliant and fruitful research program. But it is, as currently envisioned, another luddite fantasy rather than an institutional solution to modernity that can compete with democratic secular humanism and irrational financial probabilism. Until [...]
Don’t get me wrong. I’m all in favor of NPR. I’m a listener, albiet not a frequent one. On the other hand, using taxpayer money for purposes that are political in nature, content, or value judgements which other taxpayers find [...]
Constitutional Monarchy And Aristocratic Philosophy Need An Ideology – A Rationally Competitive Economic Ideology
An Ideology: Any reasonably coherent set of social, cultural, moral and political ideas that can be used to obtain and hold political power on the behalf of a part of a population that perceives it has similar interests.
Copied here from http://judithcurry.com/2011/03/06/climate-story-telling-angst.
On Climate ETC: Judith Curry writes:
If climate scientists were to use their past accomplishments to bolster their current claims, there would be less controversy, as it’s more difficult to undermine the credibility of established achievements. [...]
And one more thing that I just see too much of – arguments over definitions.
I. A definition is a contract between two or more people on the properties, causal relations and utility of those relations.
I.I A term [...]
My rights are protected by my willingess to kill in order to defend them. Legal documents either require that many people are willing to kill to defend them, or that many people are willing to kill to enforce them, or [...]
Humans unconsciously rely upon these social constructs in order to establish priorities in political decision making:
The Family The Cult The Tribe The Fraternity
In the west, we rely upon the fraternity. The remnants of our military social order.
Democracy [...]
RE: Harmful illusions bedevil ideas about free markets and imprisonment: professor
By Sarah Galer
In which yet another left wing professor who hasn’t read Hayek, criticizes him (and advocates like myself) while relying upon ‘silly psychology’ to do so. [...]
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Recent Posts
-
Putting The American Failure To Support Britain Over Argentina In Strategic Context
32 days ago -
Four Levers Of Policy Create An Opportunity For Exchange
33 days ago -
A Not So Funny, All Too True. Anti Immigration Cartoon
33 days ago -
Teasing Karl Smith: The Futility Of Teaching Pigs To Sing
33 days ago -
An Argument In Support Of Faith As A Limit On The State
34 days ago -
WORD BUDGETS: Writing vs Speaking, and the Male vs Female myth.
35 days ago -
Why Are Conservatives Happier?
35 days ago -
Stratfor On Iran’s Strategy
36 days ago -
A Heretical Question? Do Women Have Too Much Power?
36 days ago -
Libertarian Strategy
37 days ago
-
Putting The American Failure To Support Britain Over Argentina In Strategic Context