It’s Not That I Value Free Markets In The Abstract.
Last night, a wonderfully intelligent Canadian I’ve recently met referred to me as a ‘free marketer’. Which in Canadian lingo is a synonym for Libertarian. (We clearly need a Mises chapter up here in eastern Canada.)
And, I’m fussing [...]
Continue Reading →
What I Learned From Lew Rockwell
There are few worthy intellectuals outside of Sowell who are capable of, or have succeeded, in altering the conservative public rhetorical framework. Our think-tanks are largely efforts at consolidating political parties behind the language of moral sentiments — not adapting [...]
Continue Reading →
Karl Smith Is A Better Public Intellectual Than Paul Krugman
Today, Karl reminds us that he has been harping for a long time on the fact that we could borrow money very cheaply during the recession — actually, with negative real costs — and put it to use in the [...]
Continue Reading →
An Propertarian Interpretation Of The Timeline Of Philosophy
The history of philosophy can be reduced to the five struggles:
1) First, between man’s primary desire to retreat into the limits of his senses in the face of evolving complexity, and his reluctant acknowledgement that he must learn [...]
Continue Reading →
Getting To Denmark
This has a distinctly Chinese authoritarian tone to it. And that’s OK. If we can admire the Chinese for their current economy we can admire the rest of their political edicts too:
Economists, social scientists, public intellectuals and politicians all [...]
Continue Reading →
We’re Not Exporting Democracy. We’re Exporting Consumer Capitalism. And Our Military Is Very A Profitable Investment. (Really)
USEFUL IDEAS FOR DEFENSE OF CONSERVATIVE IDEAS
On [online magazine] Counterpunch today, Paul Craig Roberts asks Is Western Democracy Real or a Facade?
He starts with:
The United States government and its NATO puppets have been killing Muslim men, women [...]
Continue Reading →
Defending Karl Smith
On Modeled Behavior, a commenter pulls an ad hominem:
Karl, I won’t call you a hack–you aren’t, but the first part of that post contained breathtaking partisan quackery.
And I replied:
Jon.
Karl is not a quack. He honestly [...]
Continue Reading →
I should follow up on my last post with this thought:
1) For the fist time in western history, military leadership has been effectively denuded of political power. Our politicians are not only not required to have demonstrated military experience, [...]
Continue Reading →
Yes. It’s OK. I know. I Realize I’m Adding The Virtue Of Violence Back Into Libertarianism.
Violence is a virtue not a vice.
Like any resource it is scarce and can be put to good and ill uses.
But try to create property rights without it.
Try to hold your property rights without [...]
Continue Reading →
The Source Of Western Individualism Is In Its Military Strategy
A letter to HBD_CHICK
RE: “l’explication de l’idéologie”
@HBD_CHICK
First, I meant to write earlier so apologies for the delayed comment
Second, translating your argument into an economist’s language:
1) “Signaling” is the term economists use to describe [...]
Continue Reading →
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Points To Ponder
Recent Posts
-
Changing Identity: From American to English-American, to Diasporic Englishman
40 days ago -
A Counter To Complaints Against Indefinite Detention
43 days ago -
The Arab Spring Demonstrates The Stability Of Monarchy
44 days ago -
The Second and Further Questions Of Politics
46 days ago -
The First Question of Politics
47 days ago -
Proudhon’s Crusoe Presents A False Moral Dilemma
48 days ago -
A Propertarian Analysis Of Your Bedroom Activities
48 days ago -
EVERYTHING FRENCH IS BAD EXCEPT THE FOOD AND ARCHITECTURE
52 days ago -
Classifying People By Their Government Rather Than Occupation Simply Justifies The Expansion Of State Power
56 days ago -
Four Reasons For The Long Term Decline In Violence
59 days ago
-
Changing Identity: From American to English-American, to Diasporic Englishman