From interfluidity: Depression is a choice (Yes, it’s a lower cost for freedom than the alternatives.)
On interfuidity, Steve Randy Waldman writes:
We are in a depression, but not because we don’t know how to remedy the problem. We are in a depression because it is our revealed preference, as a polity, not to remedy the problem. We are choosing continued depression because we prefer it to the alternatives.
That’s true. We are in a depression because further empowering the state to interfere in our lives is a higher cost than weathering the depression. And it is CHEAPER to disempower the state now, than it would be by alternative, more physical means.
A depression that deprives the state of power, is a cheap way of buying freedom.
Usually we have to risk our lives, not our pocketbooks.
2 Responses to From interfluidity: Depression is a choice (Yes, it’s a lower cost for freedom than the alternatives.)
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
About

Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Conservative Libertarian tradition. And as a methodological Propertarian I attempt to complete the work of Rothbard and Hoppe by suggesting post-democratic political solutions for heterogeneous polities.Purpose
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Connect with:
Recent Posts
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.
67 days ago -
Liberty Isn't Inherent. It's unnatural. We create it with Organized Violence.
71 days ago -
Propertarian Definition: REVOLUTION
71 days ago -
Giving Rorty Another Try
71 days ago -
An Skeleton Argument In Defense Of Rorty From Hoppe
71 days ago -
A Propertarian Definition of Ruthless
71 days ago -
The Self Deception Of The Enlightenment View Of Man
71 days ago -
On Rent Seeking
71 days ago
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.
A powerful State? I think that’s fashionable to think, but silly. Generally, it’s broke and confused and easily influenced. That’s not power.
Our era is burdened and confused. Scapegoats abound.
Our worry and entrenchment and arguing reminds me of a bumper sticker: Run! The paranoids are coming.
Were our State potent, we’d have very different things to say.
Brian,
Thank you for the comment.
Although you didn’t give me anything to work with. :)
Power need not be intentional, it need only alter the course of events, or prevent altering the course of events.
As you suggest (I think) prevention is an action.
Cheers.
Curt