Krugman Watch: Austerity Class? Or is it a Starve-The-Beast Class?
Paul Krugman Quotes Ari Berman today:
The central paradox in American politics over the past two years: how, in the midst of a massive unemployment crisis—when it’s painfully obvious that not enough jobs are being created and the public overwhelmingly wants policy-makers to focus on creating them—did the deficit emerge as the most pressing issue in the country? And why, when the global evidence clearly indicates that austerity measures will raise unemployment and hinder, not accelerate, growth, do advocates of austerity retain such distinction today?
An explanation can be found in the prominence of an influential and aggressive austerity class—an allegedly centrist coalition of politicians, wonks and pundits who are considered indisputably wise custodians of US economic policy.
This is part of Paul Krugman’s attempt to position the right as illogical or stupid rather than entirely rational, but nationalistic.
STRATEGY VS TACTICS
So which name applies? You can name the group by it’s tactic or it’s strategy. Strategically, It’s a ‘Starve The Beast’ class, and tactically it’s an ‘Austerity class’. Of course, engaging in framing is certainly helpful for your side of the fence. But what they are doing is not irrational. It’s entirely rational. It’s entirely logical. And to a large degree it’s working.
Nationalism always rules. People are tribal. Even in the aggregate, they’re tribal.
It would be helpful if more economists studied history, philosophy and politics – just so they’d know what they’re measuring. But then those on the left would become conservatives. :) And that would just be to much for them. :)
FREEDOM VS EQUALITY
The same is true of Freedom vs Equality. These things are polar opposites. The left wants equality (redistribution) and the right wants freedom (concentration) and the classical liberal (like me) simply wants to create a set of institutions that facilitate this difference in wants into a game of exchanges that are mutually beneficial.
The west’s uniqueness is it’s subconscious desire for freedom by creating institutional games that create a balance of power where everyone wins – even though as individuals, we sometimes win or lose.
Krugman and the left want to create a new Confucian bureaucracy. They have’t given up on totalitarianism. And they openly despise the philosophy of ‘The Game’.
About

Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Conservative Libertarian tradition. And as a methodological Propertarian I attempt to complete the work of Rothbard and Hoppe by suggesting post-democratic political solutions for heterogeneous polities.Purpose
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Connect with:
Recent Posts
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.
68 days ago -
Liberty Isn't Inherent. It's unnatural. We create it with Organized Violence.
72 days ago -
Propertarian Definition: REVOLUTION
72 days ago -
Giving Rorty Another Try
72 days ago -
An Skeleton Argument In Defense Of Rorty From Hoppe
72 days ago -
A Propertarian Definition of Ruthless
72 days ago -
The Self Deception Of The Enlightenment View Of Man
72 days ago -
On Rent Seeking
72 days ago
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.