Great panel discussion today, with speakers on China, Turkey, Islam, Europe, and the Anglosphere.
The closing questions were largely to do with the changing world boundaries, and nationalism.
Summary by, I think, John O’Sullivan, was that, it certainly appears, that [...]
Someone asked me (again) today, why I waste my time on some silly online political debate group. And that’s a good question. But I know the answer. It’s a choice.
First, it’s not really very useful to argue with people [...]
In yet another debate with crooks masquerading as libertarians.
I ask “Define Moral.”
Bob replies “Moral = “Absence of coercion. Immoral = Presence of coercion (force or fraud).”
Then he teases me a bit for my usually turgid analytical analysis: [...]
As Camus said, the first problem of philosophy is why we do not commit suicide. But that is followed by the first problem of political philosophy, which is not “how do we best get along?” It is “Why don’t I [...]
From Peter Gordon, referring to an article in the Atlantic.
“The LA metropolitan area is actually spread over parts of five counties and includes twice as many cities as writer Conor Friedersdorf cites. The Orange county-LA county boundary is [...]
When people disparage the private sector and seek services from the government what they really mean is one or more of the following:
1) DISCOUNT ON RESEARCH / RISK REDUCTION: “I am not able to judge the services in the [...]
About

Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Conservative Libertarian tradition. And as a methodological Propertarian I attempt to complete the work of Rothbard and Hoppe by suggesting post-democratic political solutions for heterogeneous polities.Purpose
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Connect with:
Recent Posts
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.
71 days ago -
Liberty Isn't Inherent. It's unnatural. We create it with Organized Violence.
75 days ago -
Propertarian Definition: REVOLUTION
75 days ago -
Giving Rorty Another Try
75 days ago -
An Skeleton Argument In Defense Of Rorty From Hoppe
75 days ago -
A Propertarian Definition of Ruthless
75 days ago -
The Self Deception Of The Enlightenment View Of Man
75 days ago -
On Rent Seeking
75 days ago
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.