A Political Movement Pretending To Be A Religion Replaces A Religion Pretending To Be A Political Movement
From The Left’s Unlikely Alliance with Islam By Robert Eugene Simmons Jr.
Most fair-minded Americans have no problem with people who wish to practice their religion. In addition, most fair-minded Americans know of the difficult pasts of Christianity and Judaism and would demand of Islam what has been demanded of other religions. Americans don’t tolerate inquisitions anymore than they do Sharia courts. Americans realize that religious freedom is inherent in the melting pot that is America, but they also understand that all religions must exist under an umbrella of mutual respect and within the boundaries of common law. Americans would no more accept honor killings than they would accept a Catholic man killing atheists for the sake of his religion. The freedom of religion, in the end, is not a carte blanche to do whatever you wish and then yell “first amendment,” but rather a constraint to prevent the government from imposing a single religion, as Islamic governments do.
I would add, that any religion that seeks dominion over temporal matters (to establish laws) is not a religion, but a political movement masquerading as a religion. And any religion that encourages its people to lie about their convictions, is incompatible with democratic government. Even worse, it’s incompatible with the western way of life.
First we encounter Marxism, which is a religion masquerading as a political movement. When we finally defeat Marxism the void is almost immediately filled by Islam, which is a political movement masquerading as a religion.
Islam and Marxism are the same. They are the totalitarianism of equality in ignorance and poverty.
(In retrospect, Christianity wasn’t much better when it was brought into the empire. )
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Recent Posts
-
Putting The American Failure To Support Britain Over Argentina In Strategic Context
32 days ago -
Four Levers Of Policy Create An Opportunity For Exchange
33 days ago -
A Not So Funny, All Too True. Anti Immigration Cartoon
33 days ago -
Teasing Karl Smith: The Futility Of Teaching Pigs To Sing
33 days ago -
An Argument In Support Of Faith As A Limit On The State
34 days ago -
WORD BUDGETS: Writing vs Speaking, and the Male vs Female myth.
35 days ago -
Why Are Conservatives Happier?
35 days ago -
Stratfor On Iran’s Strategy
36 days ago -
A Heretical Question? Do Women Have Too Much Power?
36 days ago -
Libertarian Strategy
37 days ago
-
Putting The American Failure To Support Britain Over Argentina In Strategic Context




