Rebirth Of Keynes? A Ghostly Visage Maybe, and a Dire Prediction
T
his is a posting I put on another site, regarding one of the many statements that government intervention is alive and well, and so therefore is Keynes.
Keynes is dead. Socialism is not. Intervention is not. Keynes has become a code word for justifying intervention. it is a code word for a movement left by the body politic, as a reaction to geopolitical changes more than anything else.
The problem we are facing today is the RESULT of the kind of inflation and manipulation that Keynes recommended, and the reason that the inflation did no good, was for the reasons Hayek stated.
We have ruined our people. Money and prices are knowledge. And we used that lack of knowledge to make our people into the unwashed ignorant consumers.
And there is no technology that the west currently possesses that can increase production sufficiently to work off the debt as increases in production.
So, whereas Hayek thought Keynes was so obviously wrong that it wasn’t worth his time to refute him, we are all about to get a lesson, a tragic one, in how incompetent the controls that the government has are, in the face of a work force that is not a century ahead of it’s global competitors in technology and infrastructure.
The only profit we have been making for the past decade is in selling our opportunity costs to immigrants, and our citizen’s initiative to material consumption, our business leaders to the exploitation of fiat money, and our social order to debt inflation.
Anyone in government wants to support keynes. Because it justifies their jobs. Just like any other religion justifies the existence of it’s priests. But industry knows better. The entire infrastructure of the country, from it’s taxes, to laws, to roads, airports and air traffic control, to electrical grid, to factories, to it’s banking system, and especially it’s local banks that are deprived of knowledgeable lending management, is in decay. Now, is that because we ahve not taxed people enough? Or is it because, with cheap money, none of these investments is worth investment by the private sector?
It’s the latter.
Keynes will have a short rebirth. It will be his ghost. Because this is not going to be a two year recession. It’s going to be a five to eight year global depression. And on the other side. Keynes will be dead.
Curt
About

Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Conservative Libertarian tradition. And as a methodological Propertarian I attempt to complete the work of Rothbard and Hoppe by suggesting post-democratic political solutions for heterogeneous polities.Purpose
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of the European Aristocratic Manorial system and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Connect with:
Recent Posts
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.
70 days ago -
Liberty Isn't Inherent. It's unnatural. We create it with Organized Violence.
74 days ago -
Propertarian Definition: REVOLUTION
74 days ago -
Giving Rorty Another Try
74 days ago -
An Skeleton Argument In Defense Of Rorty From Hoppe
74 days ago -
A Propertarian Definition of Ruthless
74 days ago -
The Self Deception Of The Enlightenment View Of Man
74 days ago -
On Rent Seeking
74 days ago
-
Kinsella’s Criticism of Locke, and My Explanation of Locke’s Reasonable Mistake, and What To Do About It.