My Economic Prediction for the Next Five Years
In 2004, I predicted the following:
- By November of 2005 the expansion of the US economy would stop (Correct)
- By August of 2006 we would structurally be in recession, regardless of the numbers promoted by the federal government (Correct)
- By October of 2006 we would see a slowdown in business (correct)
- Between November and February we would see a market correction of 30%. I refined this to December 15th, which has since passed. (Incorrect)
- By March 2007 we would openly discuss a state of recession. By August of 2007 we would be in full recession.
- The recession will last until the spring of 2010.
- The baby boomer reduction will hit shortly thereafter and fight against the attempted recovery.
- The US will drag the planet into worldwide reorganization the scope of which we have not seen since the fall of the Roman Empire.
This does not mean that people will not make money, or that businesses will not continue. It means that there will be less of a distribution of prosperity, and that prosperity we have made by our knowledge production will expand far less quickly. The counter-argument is that the number of people in the population simply affects the amount of economic innovation that occurs, but this is counter to what has happened in the history of Asia, which returns to the equilibrium of poverty just as quickly as the innovation can be implemented.
I will try to keep this updated as we move through time.
About
Curt Doolittle
Seattle, WA, United States
"De Philosophia Aristocratia"
I am an independent theorist of Political Economy in the Austrian Libertarian tradition. As a methodological Propertarian, I support the Property and Freedom Society, The Mises Institute, and the Neo-Classical LIberalism Movement.Purpose
Anglo Conservatism is the remnant of Aristocratic philosophy and the Classical Liberal philosophy of the Enlightenment, combined with our ancient tribal instincts for group persistence and land-holding. It currently consists as a set of sentiments rather than as an articulated rational philosophy. And without that rational articulation, conservatives lack the ability to create and promote a plan that is a positive and rhetorically defensible alternative to the hazards of accidental bureaucracy and purposeful socialism.
This lack of an articulated philosophy leaves conservatives vulnerable in the public debate with Schumpeterian public intellectuals whose advantage in both volume of production, and simplicity of argument poses a nearly insurmountable challenge.
Libertarianism by contrast, is a rational philosophy of an articulate but permanent minority. It is based upon a solid, rational and critical methodology, even if it is flawed in its initial assumption: the principle of non-violence.
Unfortunately the Rothbardian Anarchist movement has appropriated the term "Libertarian", and left Classical Liberals and Conservatives alienated from the only system of thought with which they need to articulate their political sentiments in rational and empirical rather than moralistic and sentimental form.
By repairing the flaws in Libertarian philosophy we can use its methodology to provide a rhetorical solution for conservatives - a language which in turn may become an articulated philosophical body of argument and advocacy for the frustrated conservative majority.
Points To Ponder
Recent Posts
-
Defining Capitalism
56 days ago -
Inverting The Argument: Inequality Is The Product Of Diversity
56 days ago -
Why Are Artificial Breasts All The Rage In Columbia?
57 days ago -
From Freedom To Slavery: The Five Evolutionary Stages Of Fiat Money
57 days ago -
Doolittle's Chart's On Political Preferences
64 days ago -
My Friend Karl Smith's Progressive Framing
64 days ago -
An Anti-Masculine Bias In Pornography Actors?
64 days ago -
Labor and Education Numbers Illustrate What's Wrong With Progressives And Keynesianism
64 days ago -
Keynesian Absurd Optimism
66 days ago -
Why Do Left-Leaning Economists Ignore IQ Data?
71 days ago
-
Defining Capitalism



